Nuts + Bolts: Raise The Roof

(Page 3 of 3)

Article Tools
Bookmark and Share

Slate
Cost: $$$$
Life expectancy: 100 +
Pros:
■ Natural material
■ Reusable
■ Recyclable
Cons: 
■ Nonrenewable material
■ Mined
■ Heavy to ship
■ Needs structural support for weight

RELATED CONTENT

Plastic/rubber polymer shingles
Cost: $$-$$$
Life expectancy: 40 to 50 +
Pros:
■ Often made from
recycled materials
■ Durable
Cons: 
■ Some products new and not fully tested for longevity

Concrete/fiber-cement
Cost: $$$
Life expectancy: 40 to 50 +
Pros:
■ Often made from recycled materials
Cons:
■ High embodied energy
■ Most shingles end up
in landfills

Metal
Cost: $$$
Life expectancy: 50 +
Pros:
■ Prefinishing an option
■ Very durable
■ Reflects heat
■ Recyclable
Cons: 
■ High embodied energy

A TRULY GREEN ROOF

There’s always the possibility of making all or part of your roof a “green” or “living” roof, planted with vegetation. Popular in Europe but not yet in the United States, a number of different green roof systems are available to suit varying needs.

On the most basic level, all green roofs require several things, according to industry association Green Roofs for Healthy Cities (www.GreenRoofs.org): a high-quality waterproofing system that also repels invasive roots; an adequate drainage system; a filter cloth; a lightweight soil; and, of course, plants. Among many benefits, green roofs can extend the lifespan of the roofing material, reduce heating and cooling costs and stormwater runoff, and provide noise absorption and a place to garden. If whole cities had green roofs, the heat island effect—warmer urban temperatures—could be mitigated.

Page: << Previous 1 | 2 | 3 |

Comments

  • branden wilson 1/1/2009 2:26:08 PM

    your information about roofing materials is much closer to mainstream misconceptions brought on by high dollar marketing schemes rather than actual truth. i would expect a mag with the title natural in it would not promote toxic products but it seems everyone wants on the green bandwagon now. slate, clay, wood, thach, copper, zinc and brass are all natural, non-toxic roofs that have proven themselves for thousands of years and are still the products of choice for those who are not swayed to and fro every time the wind blows. i don't expect most people to understand life cycle costing (especially in america) but it's the variable that's consistently left out in today's projections. i'm a natural permanent roofing contractor, i was somewhat interested in your mag but it seems you're just going with the flow instead of standing on truth. caring about the environment has always been the right thing to do, it has only recently become popular as it became profitable. please, if you're going to gather information for your readers get your information from someone who isn't trying to sell something.

  • branden wilson 1/1/2009 2:24:06 PM

    your information about roofing materials is much closer to mainstream misconceptions brought on by high dollar marketing schemes rather than actual truth. i would expect a mag with the title natural in it would not promote toxic products but it seems everyone wants on the green bandwagon now. slate, clay, wood, thach, copper, zinc and brass are all natural, non-toxic roofs that have proven themselves for thousands of years and are still the products of choice for those who are not swayed to and fro every time the wind blows. i don't expect most people to understand life cycle costing (especially in america) but it's the variable that's consistently left out in today's projections. i'm a natural permanent roofing contractor, i was somewhat interested in your mag but it seems you're just going with the flow instead of standing on truth. caring about the environment has always been the right thing to do, it has only recently become popular as it became profitable. please, if you're going to gather information for your readers get your information from someone who isn't trying to sell something.

  • Ahna 12/11/2008 2:02:48 PM

    With regard to the information in the article, there are some discrepancies that need to stand corrected with regard to concrete roof tile, as follows:

    1. The category concrete/fiber cement is not correct:
    Concrete roof tile should not be categorized with fiber cement for the following reasons: The main difference is that we gain our product strength from the combination of sand and cement. Fiber cement products combine cement and fiber with other fillers and use a higher proportion of cement in the formulation. The presence of the fiber makes it more difficult to recycle these products in other construction materials. Perversely, the best fiber to use was asbestos as it chemically bonded with the cement paste to form high strength structure. Fiber cement manufacturers have struggled to find a replacement for asbestos as it is difficult to produce a fiber with the equivalent bond strength and modulus. Many fiber cement products have come and gone. Failures have been through moisture uptake, de-bonding, cracking, whitening and curling. In comparison, concrete tiles have a history of durability going back over 100 years.
    2. The cost reference of concrete tile is not accurate:
    MonierLifetile’s concrete roof tile product is warranted for the life of a structure and therefore has one of the lowest life cycle costs of any roofing material. Beyond its life cycle cost, concrete roof tile is actually an affordable roofing product with a price point much less than rubber, metal, and wood and is competitive with medium to high grade asphalt shingles.
    3. Embodied energy as a con is not correct/inadequately referenced:
    The largest constituent in concrete tiles is sand. Cement forms less than 25% of the mix and this proportion is further reduced by the incorporation of “post industrial materials” such as fly ash (captured from power station chimneys). Although the production of cement requires energy, this is offset by the ability of concrete tile to reabsorb aro

  • Barbara Weathers 6/20/2008 9:37:24 AM

    Are there any alternatives for flat roofs?

Add Your Comment

You can use this comment form to enter your personal experiences or additional information and resources that you'd like to share with Natural Home readers. Your helpful advice will be posted on this page.  E-mail addresses are never displayed on comments, but they are required to confirm your comments.

Line breaks and paragraphs are automatically converted — no need to use <p> or <br> tags.

New to Natural Home Magazine?
Sign up to share comments.
Asterisks(*) indicate required fields.
Name*
Your name appears next to your comment.

E-mail Address*
This will be your login ID.

City State Zip Code

Password*


Confirm Password*

Comments
1500 character limit (Offensive materials and/or spam will be removed, no HTML allowed)
Please Note: Your sign-up must be verified via e-mail before your comment is published.


Subscribe today and save 50%
First Name: *
Last Name: *
Address: *
City: *
State/Province: *
Zip/Postal Code:*
Country:
Email:*
(* indicates a required item)
Canadian subs: 1 year, (includes postage & GST). Foreign subs: 1 year, . U.S. funds.
Canadian Subscribers - Click Here
Non US and Canadian Subscribers - Click Here

Subscribe to Natural Home

Welcome to Natural Home, the authority on green lifestyle and design. With an up-to-date outlook on current trends in sustainable building and wholesome living, Natural Home gives today’s eco-conscious homeowners the information they need to live in nurturing, healthy homes. Subscribe to Natural Home today to get inspired on the art of living wisely and living well.

Save money and a few trees by paying with your credit card now. Take advantage of our earth-friendly automatic renewal savings plan. You’ll save an additional $4.95 and get six issues of Natural Home for just $15! (Offer valid only in the U.S.)

Or, choose Bill Me Later and pay just $19.95